<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Suburban on Class Letters</title><link>https://classletters.org/tags/suburban/</link><description>Recent content in Suburban on Class Letters</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2023 07:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://classletters.org/tags/suburban/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Cuacasians Only</title><link>https://classletters.org/posts/suburbia/cuacasians_only/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2023 07:18:50 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://classletters.org/posts/suburbia/cuacasians_only/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A small but very important subsection from Robert Fogelson&amp;rsquo;s book &amp;ldquo;Bourgeois&#10;Nightmares: Suburbia, 1870-1930&amp;rdquo;. I would say it speaks for itself.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Many subdividers also employed restrictions to exclude&#10;‘‘undesirable’’ people as well as &amp;ldquo;undesirable&amp;rdquo; activities. By far the&#10;most common of these provisions were racial covenants. Under&#10;a typical covenant, an owner was forbidden to sell or lease the&#10;property to a member of any of a number of allegedly undesirable&#10;racial, ethnic, or religious groups. He or she was also forbidden&#10;to allow a member of these groups, other than chauffeurs, gardeners, or domestic servants, to use or occupy the property. A few&#10;subdividers had employed racial covenants in the mid-nineteenth&#10;century. In Brookline, for example, one forbade &amp;ldquo;any negro or&#10;native of Ireland&amp;rdquo; to occupy a dwelling, and in Baltimore another&#10;barred the sale or lease of a house to &amp;ldquo;a negro or person of African&#10;or Mongolian [that is, Asian] descent.&amp;rdquo; But such restrictions were&#10;very much the exception before the 1890s. Indeed, not even the&#10;most racist subdividers imposed racial covenants. A case in point&#10;was Francis G. Newlands, the mining magnate and U.S. senator&#10;who laid out Chevy Chase in the early 1890s. Newlands saw the&#10;United States as &amp;ldquo;the home of the white race.&amp;rdquo; To him, &amp;ldquo;race tolerance&amp;rdquo; meant &amp;ldquo;race amalgamation,&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;race intolerance&amp;rdquo; meant&#10;&amp;ldquo;race war.&amp;rdquo; Fusing the racism of the South with the racism of the&#10;West, he called for repealing the Fifteenth Amendment, thereby&#10;denying African-Americans, &amp;ldquo;an inferior race,&amp;rdquo; the right to vote,&#10;and restricting immigration to &amp;ldquo;the white race,&amp;rdquo; thereby excluding Chinese, Japanese, and other Asians. Despite his outspoken racism, Newlands did not include racial covenants among the&#10;minimum cost requirements and other restrictions he imposed&#10;on the first subdivisions at Chevy Chase.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>