<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>New-Left on Class Letters</title><link>https://classletters.org/tags/new-left/</link><description>Recent content in New-Left on Class Letters</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2024 04:01:32 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://classletters.org/tags/new-left/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Seven Types of Obloquy: Traversties of Marxism</title><link>https://classletters.org/posts/geras/seven_types/</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2024 04:01:32 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://classletters.org/posts/geras/seven_types/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I see this as a terrific example of where reasoned and well formed criticism&#10;can stand on its own, in spite of the divergent trajectory which the author&#10;appears to take later on in his life through his reactionary offshoots.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;As with any analytical field of inquiry which aspires to achieving insights, syntheses and increased understandings of the world, Marxism contains a broad array of unique and differeing perspectives, some of which fall far short of the high standard of rigor demanded of a scientific field. Here, Geras addresses several lazy and incongruent arguments put forward by Marxists who are themselves claiming to remedy pitfalls in Marx&amp;rsquo;s views; a public purging of sorts, these types of obloquy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>