<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Marcel-Mauss on Class Letters</title><link>https://classletters.org/tags/marcel-mauss/</link><description>Recent content in Marcel-Mauss on Class Letters</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2023 05:03:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://classletters.org/tags/marcel-mauss/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Conclusion to the Gift</title><link>https://classletters.org/posts/marcel-mauss/conclusion-to-the-gift/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2023 05:03:51 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://classletters.org/posts/marcel-mauss/conclusion-to-the-gift/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The conclusion to Mauss&amp;rsquo;s incredible essay on the uses and concepts of gifts.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="moral-conclusions"&gt;Moral Conclusions&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;It is possible to extend these observations to our own&#10;societies. A considerable part of our morality and our lives&#10;themselves are still permeated with this same atmosphere of&#10;the gift, where obligation and liberty intermingle. Fortunately,&#10;everything is still not wholly categorized in terms of buying&#10;and selling. Things still have sentimental as well as venal value,&#10;assuming values merely of this kind exist. We possess more&#10;than a tradesman morality. There still remain people and&#10;classes that keep to the morality of former times, and we&#10;almost all observe it, at least at certain times of the year or&#10;on certain occasions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>