<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>IMF on Class Letters</title><link>https://classletters.org/tags/imf/</link><description>Recent content in IMF on Class Letters</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 May 2025 06:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://classletters.org/tags/imf/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Chile, an Investigation of Aid as Imperialism</title><link>https://classletters.org/posts/assorted/aid_as_imperialism_chile/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2025 06:20:02 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://classletters.org/posts/assorted/aid_as_imperialism_chile/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Teresa Hayter&amp;rsquo;s &amp;lsquo;Aid as Imperialism&amp;rsquo;, was one of the first somewhat critical&#10;texts written about the post world-war II monetary institutions, from a so&#10;called insider&amp;rsquo;s view. Having spent some time employed at the Overseas&#10;Development Institute, the World Bank financed Teresa&amp;rsquo;s research on the&#10;effectiveness of aid packages provided to Third World countries. Given it was&#10;intended as a publication on behalf of the ODI, one certainly encounters a&#10;report which offers an objective overview of the various policy approaches that&#10;these institutions taken. The first half of the text, is an outline, not a&#10;critique. The second half turns to evaluating the implementation of these&#10;approaches in several countries. Here is where we find a critical evaluation,&#10;which best portrays the inflexibility of foreign aid packages, which, Teresa&#10;believed, were given more so as blanket prescriptions, dogmas even. A standard&#10;buffet of currency devaluations and austerity measures &amp;mdash; liberalize,&#10;liberalize, liberalize! It is for this reason that the Overseas Development&#10;Institute rejected the original report for publication. Fortunately, it&#10;eventually made it&amp;rsquo;s way to us common readers. The following is an excerpt from the&#10;text, focusing on the involvement of these aid agencies in Chile, a country which is emblematic of the deep difficulties of modernization and sovereignty in the global periphery.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Global Neoliberal Practice: Institutions and Regulation in Africa</title><link>https://classletters.org/posts/assorted/neoliberal_africa_global_practice/</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2023 22:51:40 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://classletters.org/posts/assorted/neoliberal_africa_global_practice/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a chapter out of Graham Harrison&amp;rsquo;s Book &amp;ldquo;Neoliberal Africa: The Impact&#10;of Global Social Engineering&amp;rdquo;. Although the book is more of an essay containing&#10;fragmentary thoughts, I found this chapter substantial in the sense that it&#10;clearly outlined the various institutional avenues in which projects such as&#10;neoliberalism cement their ideology.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;hr&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;This chapter considers the global emergence of neoliberalism. It looks at the&#10;ways in which neoliberal practice has emerged, expanded and established for&#10;itself ‘paradigmatic’ status. In other words, it shows how neoliberalism has&#10;shifted from an ambitious and embryonic set of policy interventions to&#10;something resembling a framework or set of premisses within which policy is&#10;articulated. The practices of neoliberalism have been iterated over such time&#10;as to shift the habits, conduct and repertoire of development practice tout&#10;court. The layering of large numbers of neoliberal policies has not only led to&#10;a progressively more totalising implementation of liberalisation; it has also&#10;defined the terms upon which policy and development are thought about and&#10;articulated per se. This is, of course, not a completed process (in the last&#10;chapter we developed a framework which is anathema to the idea of completed&#10;processes, preferring instead a series of practices in place of means–ends&#10;distinctions), but it has enabled neoliberal ideas to aspire to&#10;‘meta-development’ status: that is, as the terms upon which development is&#10;discussed rather than solely as a predominant model of development. At the&#10;level of ideas, this shift or tendency is rather like the analysis of Hay in&#10;which neoliberalism moves from normalising to normative (Hay 2004).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>