<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Historiography on Class Letters</title><link>https://classletters.org/tags/historiography/</link><description>Recent content in Historiography on Class Letters</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:12:05 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://classletters.org/tags/historiography/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Notes on 'What is History'</title><link>https://classletters.org/posts/assorted/what_is_history_carr/</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:12:05 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://classletters.org/posts/assorted/what_is_history_carr/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;That elusive entity &amp;lsquo;human nature&amp;rsquo; has varied so much from country to country
and from century to century that it is difficult not to regard it as a
historical phenomenon shaped by prevailing social conditions and conventions.
There are many differences between, say, Americans, Russians, and Indians. But
some, and perhaps the most important, of these differences take the form of
different attitudes to social relations between individuals, or, in other
words, to the way in which society should be constituted, so that the study of
differences between American, Russian, and Indian society as a whole may well
turn out to be the best way of studying differences between individual
Americans, Russians, and Indians. Civilized man, like primitive man, is moulded
by society just as effectively as society is moulded by him. You can no more
have the egg without the hen than you can have the hen without the egg.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>