<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Darwinism on Class Letters</title><link>https://classletters.org/tags/darwinism/</link><description>Recent content in Darwinism on Class Letters</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2025 01:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://classletters.org/tags/darwinism/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The 'Lethal Chamber' in Eugenic Thought: an excerpt from *Breeding Superman: Nietzsche, Race and Eugenics in Edwardian and Interwar Britain*</title><link>https://classletters.org/posts/nietzsche/breeding-superman-eugenics/</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2025 01:51:19 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://classletters.org/posts/nietzsche/breeding-superman-eugenics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Chapter five from &lt;em&gt;Breeding Superman: Nietzsche, Race and Eugenics in Edwardian and Interwar Britain&lt;/em&gt; by Dan Stone.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;hr&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;As we have seen, before the First World War, and in some circles until well&#10;into the interwar period, eugenics &amp;mdash; literally, ‘well born’ or ‘good stocks’&amp;mdash; was the height of sophisticated, ‘progressive’ thought.&lt;sup id="fnref:1"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; Across Europe, the&#10;novels and plays of the period, such as H. G. Wells’s &lt;em&gt;The New Machiavelli&lt;/em&gt;&#10;(1911) and George Bernard Shaw’s &lt;em&gt;Man and Superman&lt;/em&gt; (1905), are suffused&#10;with the language of race-regeneration and fears of physical deterioration. In&#10;Arthur Schnitzler’s novel, &lt;em&gt;The Road to the Open&lt;/em&gt; (1908), Berthold Stauber, a&#10;young and enthusiastic Viennese Jewish physician, tells his father, the&#10;humane Dr Stauber, that ‘You need only consider, father, that the most&#10;honest and consistent social hygiene would have the direct result of annihilating diseased people, or at any rate excluding them from all enjoyment of&#10;life, and I don’t deny that I have all kinds of ideas tending in that way which&#10;may seem cruel at the first glance.’ He went on to say that ‘You needn’t be&#10;afraid, father, that I shall begin straight away to preach the murder of the&#10;unhealthy and superfluous. But theoretically that’s certainly what my programme leads to.’&lt;sup id="fnref:2"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:2" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; Although primarily a conservative ideology, both left and&#10;right were attracted to eugenic proposals. These ranged from ‘positive’ measures such as the encouragement of ‘hygienic marriage’, that is, marriage&#10;between two people of good stock, to ‘negative’ measures such as sterilisation or segregation in order to ensure that the unfit, feeble-minded and&#10;morally degenerate did not have children. In this chapter I will consider&#10;eugenics in general, before concentrating on one aspect of its rhetoric which&#10;to a post-Second World War audience is perhaps even more shocking than it&#10;was to an Edwardian one.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Darwin's Delay</title><link>https://classletters.org/posts/biology/sjgould/darwins_delay/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 23:28:27 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://classletters.org/posts/biology/sjgould/darwins_delay/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Few events inspire more speculation than long and unexplained pauses in the activities of&#10;famous people. Rossini crowned a brilliant operatic career with William Tell and then wrote&#10;almost nothing for the next thirty-five years. Dorothy Sayers abandoned Lord Peter Wimsey&#10;at the height of his popularity and turned instead to God. Charles Darwin developed a radical&#10;theory of evolution in 1838 and published it twenty-one years later only because A. R.&#10;Wallace was about to scoop him.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>